LogoLogo
  • Exchequer Protocol Overview
  • Protocol Concepts
    • Downside Protection
    • Liquidity Note
    • Fixed Price Sale / Auction
    • Yield Distribution
    • Upside Boost
    • Redemption
  • Note Types
    • Liquidity Note
    • Convertible Note
    • Incentive Note
  • Note Features
    • Note Types
    • Maturity
    • Upside Boost
    • Downside Protection
    • Safety Margin
    • Boosted Yield
    • 7-Day Yield
    • Time Left
    • Underlying Token
    • Pay Token
    • Protection Status
    • Collateral Dex
    • Note Price
    • Project Obligation
    • Collateral (LP) Gain/Loss
  • Offering Features
    • Signaled Interest
    • Term
    • Offering Size
    • Issue Size
    • Funding Progress
    • Liquidity Created
    • Sale Duration
    • Offering Type
    • Offering Price
    • Note Quantity
  • Signaling Features
    • Intended Investment
    • Signal Interest
  • Redemption Features
    • Note Extension
    • Note Redemption
  • Whitepapers/Research
  • Glossary
  • Integrate with Exchequer
    • Integrate with Exchequer
  • APIs
    • Exchequer Subgraph
Powered by GitBook
On this page
  • Considerations for Determining Whether to Use a Fixed Size or an Auction to Issue a Liquidity Note
  • Pros and Cons

Was this helpful?

  1. Offering Features

Offering Type

Liquidity Notes can be sold to users through two primary mechanisms:

  1. Fixed Price Sale

    In a fixed price sale, Liquidity Notes are offered at a predetermined price. This method is suitable when the project has a clear understanding of the token's price, as it requires setting an explicit price for the notes. It is also effective when there is confidence in the demand for the Liquidity Notes, reducing the need to allocate additional resources to generate interest through the sale process itself.

  2. Auction

    Alternatively, Liquidity Notes can be sold via an auction. This approach allows the market to determine the price based on current supply and demand dynamics. Auctions are beneficial when the token's price is uncertain or when the project aims to stimulate demand and engage participants through competitive bidding and speculation.

Considerations for Determining Whether to Use a Fixed Size or an Auction to Issue a Liquidity Note

Each approach has distinct advantages and considerations that can significantly impact the success of the offering. This section outlines the key factors to consider when choosing between a fixed size sale and an auction for selling Liquidity Notes, supported by numerical examples.

  1. Market Demand and Investor Behavior

    • Assessment: Understand the current demand for Liquidity Notes and the investment behavior of your target audience.

    • Impact:

      • High Demand: An auction can capitalize on strong investor interest by allowing prices to adjust based on real-time bidding.

      • Steady or Uncertain Demand: A fixed size sale provides predictability and simplicity, which can be more appealing to a broader range of investors.

  2. Price Discovery Needs

    • Assessment: Determine whether the project requires a flexible pricing mechanism that reflects market sentiment.

    • Impact:

      • Dynamic Pricing: Auctions facilitate natural price discovery, ensuring that the price of Liquidity Notes aligns with current market conditions and investor willingness to pay.

      • Stable Pricing: Fixed size sales offer a set price, which can simplify the investment process but may not fully capture the asset's market value.

  3. Liquidity Pool Goals

    • Assessment: Evaluate how the chosen sale mechanism aligns with the goals for the liquidity pool’s size and composition.

    • Impact:

      • Targeted Liquidity Levels: Fixed size sales help maintain controlled liquidity levels by limiting the number of Liquidity Notes issued.

      • Scalable Liquidity: Auctions can dynamically adjust the liquidity pool size based on real-time investor participation, fostering scalability.

Pros and Cons

Fixed Size Sale

Pros

Cons

Predictable capital raising

Potential for underselling if demand is high

Simplicity and ease of participation

Fixed price may not reflect true market value

Clear offering parameters

Limited flexibility in response to market changes

Auction

Pros

Cons

Market-driven pricing and higher potential returns

Increased complexity

Ability to capture higher demand

Uncertainty in total capital raised

Flexibility to adjust based on investor interest

Potential for volatility in final pricing

Enhanced price discovery

More complex for investors to participate

PreviousSale DurationNextOffering Price

Last updated 7 months ago

Was this helpful?